= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
dreeves comments on Against Modal Logics - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (59)
1. I'm curious to hear Nick Bostrom's response to this.
2. Something like modal logic is needed to automate solutions to things like this: Blue-eyed Monks Though you might be right about the proliferation of modal logics.
3. You made some similar points here: Where Philosophy Meets Science And Robin Hanson followed up here: On Philosophers
4. Both times it was pointed out that Paul Graham has some similar complaints about philosophy here: How to Do Philosophy