Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on The Truly Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma - Less Wrong

18 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 04 September 2008 06:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (85)
Tags: bayesian morality

Comments (85)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 September 2008 01:19:59AM 3 points [-]

I cooperate with the Paperclipper if I think it will one-box on Newcomb's Problem with myself as Omega.

This strategy would apply to the first round. For the iterated game, would you thereafter apply Tit for tat?

The strategy applies to every round equally, if the Paperclipper is in fact behaving as I expect. If the Paperclipper doesn't behave as I expect, the strategy is unuseful, and I might well switch to Tit for Tat.

Comment author: johnlawrenceaspden 18 March 2014 12:43:39AM 0 points [-]

I will one-box on Newcomb's Problem with you as Omega. As in, I really will. That's what I think the right thing to do is.

Would you care to play a round of high-stakes prisoner's dilemma?

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit