Vaniver comments on Excluding the Supernatural - Less Wrong

36 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 September 2008 12:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (124)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 19 December 2011 11:44:25AM 1 point [-]

Yeah, that must be the reason. I'm not familiar with mediaeval myths about unicorns, so it means pretty much “a horse with a horn” (but I wouldn't count an oryx as one -- the uni- part means it has to only have one horn, doesn't it :-)), but on the other hand I know about the myth of the mermaids' singing (and Ulysses's strategy to cope with it) so I wouldn't count the top half of a woman glued onto the bottom half of a fish as one.

Comment author: Vaniver 19 December 2011 05:09:56PM *  3 points [-]

Interestingly, mermaid myths may have been deliberate hoaxes, which makes the question of a "real" mermaid even muddier.

I'm not sure how Ctesias or Aristotle would react to seeing an oryx- they might decide it's a new duoceros different from monoceri or they might say "oops, I guess we only saw depictions of monoceri in profile, they actually have two horns."