RobinHanson comments on The ethic of hand-washing and community epistemic practice - Less Wrong

44 Post author: AnnaSalamon 05 March 2009 04:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RobinHanson 05 March 2009 01:21:04PM 4 points [-]

The most promising concrete suggestion I see here is to adopt verbal conventions for distinguishing direct and indirect evidence. I'm not sure the word "impression" really connotes direct evidence, though with enough consistent usage in that mode we might carve out a common meaning to that effect. But we actually have a whole range of indirection; where would the cutoff in that range be? If I actually looked something up recently in an encyclopedia, while someone else just vaguely remembers looking it up sometime long ago, is that my impression or my belief?

Comment author: anonym 08 March 2009 12:01:47AM 2 points [-]

The indication of the (kind of) evidence for a statement is known as evidentiality in linguistics.

The wikipedia article referenced above gives the example of Eastern Pomo, in which a verb takes one of 4 evidential suffixes, corresponding to the type of evidence: nonvisual sensory, inferential, hearsay, or direct knowledge (probably visual).