wedrifid comments on Rationality Quotes 18 - Less Wrong

7 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 03 October 2008 12:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 October 2013 02:18:25PM *  1 point [-]

Unless the two watches agree.

Good point. In fact I am far more likely to be sure when I have two timekeeping devices than when I have one and of those times when the man with one watch is sure but the man with two watches is not the man sure with one watch is sure and wrong over half the time.

I hope the intended rationality lesson here is approximately the opposite of the colloquial interpretation.

Comment author: tgb 14 October 2013 03:15:12PM 0 points [-]

What colloquial interpretation is there to this that you don't like? I would have read it as "Before trusting a watch, consider how well multiple watches agree with each other."

Comment author: wedrifid 14 October 2013 03:22:08PM 0 points [-]

What colloquial interpretation is there to this that you don't like? I would have read it as "Before trusting a watch, consider how well multiple watches agree with each other."

I had resolved the connotations to be along the lines of decisiveness, singleness of purpose and avoidance of confusing contradictory information. This kind of thing seems popular in in the kind of 'wisdom' expressed with that structure.

Comment author: Lumifer 15 October 2013 07:35:06PM 0 points [-]

What colloquial interpretation is there to this that you don't like?

The standard ("colloquial") interpretation is that you should carry one watch only lest you become confused -- aka too much data leads to thinking and thinking is hard (and possibly painful).