= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
michael_vassar3 comments on Why Does Power Corrupt? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (58)
Eliezer: The interesting thing in Carl's post is not that some people resist corruption but that some institutions resist putting the corrupt/corruptible in power while still putting someone in power.
Steven: VERY important point. Marx, who never held power, approved very publicly of killing large numbers in the name of his ideals. How many thoughtful people don't have silly ideologies? In any event, there are still other dynamics. I strongly recommend "Darkness at Noon" for an important one.
Carl: Consequentialism is more logically dangerous with longer time horizons. Should we fear life extensionists but not singularitarians? How do both compare to the religious?
Robin: Do we have any way to collect data on how many people read these threads past some point? I fear that its a waste of time to write long comments this far down a thread.
I for one am glad that you wrote down your thoughts..
I read this far.
Me too, but only because I saw beoShaffer's comment in the Recent Comments box.
First time poster.
I would consider myself typical, whatever weight that may carry. Here is my algorithm for reading LessWrong:
1: Start at the Core Sequences Wiki Page 2: Middle-click every blue link (not purple). 3: Go through and read to the bottom of the page (including all comments), middle clicking on things which look interesting. 4: Satisfy Tier N+1 before moving onto other Tier N articles. GOTO 3
I use a tree-style firefox tab addon pictured here: http://i.imgur.com/rmq2Z.png