AshwinV comments on Entangled Truths, Contagious Lies - Less Wrong

23 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 October 2008 11:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (38)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Tom_McCabe2 16 October 2008 03:07:29AM 0 points [-]

"Human beings, who are not gods, often fail to imagine all the facts they would need to distort to tell a truly plausible lie."

One of my pet hobbies is constructing metaphors for reality which are blatantly, factually wrong, but which share enough of the deep structure of reality to be internally consistent. Suppose that you have good evidence for facts A, B, and C. If you think about A, B, and C, you can deduce facts D, E, F, and so forth. But given how tangled reality is, it's effectively impossible to come up with a complete list of humanly-deducible facts in advance; there's always going to be some fact, Q, which you just didn't think of. Hence, if you map A, B, and C to A', B', and C', use A', B', and C' to deduce Q', and map Q' back to Q, how accurate Q is is a good check for how well you understand A, B, and C.

Comment author: AshwinV 01 July 2015 05:40:28AM 0 points [-]

It's definitely a check, but not a very good check. There are too many in between facts in this case. It really depends on whether Q is solely dependent on Q' or whether it depends on a number of other things (Q'',Q'''......), provided of course that Q'' and Q''' are not in themselves dependent on A, B and C.