Tyrrell_McAllister2 comments on Ethical Inhibitions - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (62)
No one else has brought this up, so maybe I'm just dense, but I'm having trouble distinguishing the "point" from the "counterpoint" at this part of the post:
Elezier makes a "point":
He then appears to present a possible "counterpoint":
But then he seems to say that this counterpoint doesn't suffice for him:
I'm not seeing the difference between the point and the counterpoint. Am I just misinterpreting the logic of the argument in thinking that these are supposed to be opposing points? Or, if not, how are they different?