= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
taryneast comments on Mundane Magic - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (94)
Evidence smaller than a human brain can process - where counting it as evidence would cause a brain to overestimate the evidence's value - seems like it would be a case where it's practical to consider it absolutely zero evidence.
Yes, I agree with this. I'd count it as "so negligible as to be beneath bothering to waste a neuron on it" :)
The evidence here isn't actually negligible, I don't think. It's just that the posterior probability is negligible.