JulianMorrison comments on Back Up and Ask Whether, Not Why - Less Wrong

32 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 06 November 2008 07:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JulianMorrison 07 November 2008 02:06:25AM -1 points [-]

ZMD: I'm reminded of the darcs revision control system and its patch theory. Given patches A and B applied in order (AB), it's possible to calculate two commuted patches A' and B' that when applied in the opposite order (B'A') produce the same result. If you did A, did B, and want to undo A, you commute the patches, and then take A' away from A to walk you back to B'.

That's really only an illustrative analogy, but it's a good one. You could see the algorithm here as "commute the decision to the front and delete it". So taking your example, the original was "decide, and leave, and become an individualist". The commuted version is "leave, and become an individualist, and decide". Then delete the decision. You're re-deciding in the context of the rest of the status quo as a given. "Given I have left and I have become an individualist, would I now decide to leave?".

Thinking of it that way is a bit brain-twisty, but it makes sense.

Comment author: DanielLC 16 October 2012 05:13:46AM 0 points [-]

Are you sure there's supposed to be a B'? It looks to me like you just need to calculate A' = BAB^-1. That way, when you take A' away, you get back to B instead of B'.