Venu comments on Selling Nonapples - Less Wrong

33 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 13 November 2008 08:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (81)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Venu 13 November 2008 11:37:43PM 4 points [-]

I don't get this post. There is no big mystery to asynchronous communication - a process looks for messages whenever it is convenient for it to do so, very much like we check our mail-boxes when it is convenient for us. Although it is not clear to me how asynchronous communication helps in building an AI, I don't see any underspecification here. And if people (including Brooks) have actually used the architecture for building robots, that at least must be clear proof that there is a real architecture here.

Btw, from my understanding, Thrun's team made heavy use of supervised learning - the same paradigm that Eliezer knocked down as being unFriendly in his AI risks paper.

Comment author: kodos96 16 March 2010 06:16:27PM *  7 points [-]

I DO get this post - I understand, and agree with the general concept, but I think Venu has a point that asynchronous programming is a bad example... although it LITERALLY means only "non-synchronous", in practice it refers to a pretty specific type of alternative programming methodology... much more particular than just the set of all programming methodologies that aren't synchronous.