Eliezer_Yudkowsky comments on Sustained Strong Recursion - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 December 2008 09:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 05 December 2008 10:18:49PM 3 points [-]

Engelbart was "not recursive enough" in the sense that he didn't have a strong, sustained recursion; his tech improvements did not yield an increase in engineering velocity which was sufficient to produce tech improvements that would further improve his engineering velocity. He wasn't running on his own chips. Like Eurisko, he used his scientific prowess to buy some bonds (computer tech) that paid a relatively low coupon on further scientific prowess, and the interest payments didn't let him buy all that many more bonds.