Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

eli_sennesh comments on High Challenge - Less Wrong

22 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 19 December 2008 12:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (72)

Sort By: Old

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 13 November 2015 03:27:37AM -2 points [-]

LOL. For a lot of people "self-actualization" ends up with sitting on a couch in front of an idiot box, eating chips. Nowadays it might be in front of their FB feed, but that's essentially the same. And I'm not sure what are "socially-approved-of lifestyles" -- that seem to depend a lot on the society in question.

Look, the mere fact that you condescend at and disapprove of the actions of others doesn't mean you've proposed any kind of alternative (no, survivalism does not count, that problem was already solved), let alone demonstrated a metric by which your non-proposed alternative is superior (not even the "I like it" metric).

No. My intuition is that the threat of pain/hunger/etc. makes people act. Incentives matter.

Now explain why those actions or incentives matter, that is, what makes them superior to alternatives. No, sneering does not count.