Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Three Worlds Collide (0/8)

7Eliezer_Yudkowsky30 January 2009 12:07PM

"The kind of classic fifties-era first-contact story that Jonathan Swift might have written, if Jonathan Swift had had a background in game theory."
        -- (Hugo nominee) Peter Watts, "In Praise of Baby-Eating"

Three Worlds Collide is a story I wrote to illustrate some points on naturalistic metaethics and diverse other issues of rational conduct.  It grew, as such things do, into a small novella.  On publication, it proved widely popular and widely criticized.  Be warned that the story, as it wrote itself, ended up containing some profanity and PG-13 content.

  1. The Baby-Eating Aliens
  2. War and/or Peace
  3. The Super Happy People
  4. Interlude with the Confessor
  5. Three Worlds Decide
  6. Normal Ending
  7. True Ending
  8. Atonement

PDF version here.

Comments (16)

Zubon30 January 2009 01:21:11PM1 point [-]

In the ideal case, would you recommend reading each chapter separately, with the day-long pause in between to digest, or reading them all at once? Or perhaps you would like to hear feedback from people who have taken each approach to see which works better.

botogol230 January 2009 01:32:23PM0 points [-]

wellll.. it's kinda fun, Eleizer, I guess so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and keep reading .... but....but... is this format quite right for OB?

Would this series not be better in - ooh, I don't know - a new and more open sister site of some kind, perhaps with the key points written up at the end and posted on to OB, if they seem popular? Or am I wrong.

Andrew_Ducker30 January 2009 01:44:31PM0 points [-]

When it's done, is there any chance you'll stick it online in an ereader compatible format? PDF is ok, but EPUB would be better.

I don't tend to read very long things on a computer, so having it in a more friendly format would be nice.

Eliezer_Yudkowsky30 January 2009 01:49:03PM0 points [-]

Andrew, will try to remember. Remind me when it's done.

Botogol, Less Wrong isn't ready yet, and now is when people are asking me about what sort of values aliens might have.

botogol230 January 2009 02:32:40PM0 points [-]

yup. alien ones.

Sebastian_Hagen230 January 2009 03:15:52PM0 points [-]

List of allusions I managed to catch (part 1):
Alderson starlines - Alderson Drive Giant Science Vessel - GSV - General Systems Vehicle Lord Programmer - allusion to the archeologist programmers in Vernor Vinge's A Fire Upon the Deep? Greater Archive - allusion to Orion's Arm's Greater Archives?

MichaelAnissimov30 January 2009 03:34:43PM0 points [-]

Good times!

Psy-Kosh30 January 2009 07:11:48PM1 point [-]

Oh, on the subject of stories and that post about dreams, that reminds me: You had said to remind you to tell us about your "most philosophically interesting dream"

Doug_S.31 January 2009 06:09:40AM0 points [-]

Three worlds collide?

As of part 1, we've seen two...

denis_bider31 January 2009 08:50:14PM0 points [-]

Excellent. I was reluctant to start reading at first, but when I did, I found it entertaining. This should be a TV series. :)

Thomas301 February 2009 09:24:05AM0 points [-]

I too felt a bit anxious about reading this but was glad I did! It's entertaining to read and very interesting to think about.

Thanks.

botogol201 February 2009 03:00:27PM0 points [-]

@Eliezer - nope, sorry, 3/8 now, seems like 10,000 words of cod fiction and OB has truly jumped the shark.

There's load of good ideas there but praps you shoulda' waited until LessWrong was working AllRight.

Chiaroscuro02 February 2009 05:04:41PM0 points [-]

really good writing. keep them coming :-)

Vezquex07 February 2009 10:05:10AM1 point [-]

botogol, what is cod fiction? Is COD an acronym for "capacity on demand" or "change of direction"?

elfvillage25 May 2009 08:23:54PM0 points [-]

Eliezer,

Personally, I liked the Babyeaters. At the outset of your story, I thought (1) that their babyeating would be held up as an example of the triumph of rationality (around population control), and (2) that their refusal to modify themselves would be based on their recognition that the specific act of babyeating nurtured and protected a more general capacity and respect for rational thought. I thought that Babyeating was being proposed as a bootcamp for overcoming bias. Maybe this idea would be interesting to explore?

In general, an interesting story. I did not find it possibly coercive or deceptive, as some other commentators did, and despite wide disagreement with what I take to be your own views; like your piece on truth, -- "The Simple Truth", I believe it was, -- I found it clear, deftly-made, and thought-provoking.

Alsadius23 October 2009 07:04:35AM1 point [-]

Even if one wishes to argue the virtues of mass murder as a method of intentional population control, which I find quite horrifying enough, I would hope that violent assault and month-long torture are not one's preferred methods.