= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Annoyance comments on Do Fandoms Need Awfulness? - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (151)
I am listening, but not agreeing quite yet. What are the prejudices in Star Wars or Star Trek?
Restating your point in different words: Popular prejudice is conducive to having lots of fans and the more fans you have the more fanatics will be in the fanbase. "Bad" creeps in because of the popular prejudice.
This makes sense, but going the other way sure doesn't: Having a set of fanatics does not imply a large fan base, nor does it imply lots of popular prejudices.
I also claim that something can have a large fan base without popular prejudices and something can have popular prejudices without having a fan base. I do agree that with a bigger pool of fans you are probably picking up more fanatics.
So, yeah, I guess the loose correlation makes sense. But it is right?
The future will be fundamentally better than the past or present. 'Progress' will occur. Humanity has a useful role in space. People in red shirts exist only to die.
Okay. I guess I was thinking of "prejudice" as in "anti-specific-group-of-people." But yeah, pro-humanity or pro-future prejudice makes perfect sense.