MichaelVassar comments on Can we create a function that provably predicts the optimization power of intelligences? - Less Wrong

-7 Post author: whpearson 28 May 2009 11:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Psychohistorian 28 May 2009 03:21:18PM 8 points [-]

Let me see if I understand this. Basically, you're making a hypothetical in which, if you do something right, a quasi-omniscient being intervenes and makes it not work. If you do something wrong, it lets that happen. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if this is even close to what you're saying, it seems quite pointless as a hypothetical.

Comment author: MichaelVassar 28 May 2009 07:48:13PM 1 point [-]

Honestly, this is basically a problem with most problems involving Omega etc.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 28 May 2009 08:54:39PM 0 points [-]

The problems of this kind should be stated clearly, examining a specific aspect of e.g. decision theories. In this particular case, "doing something right" or "optimization power" etc. is too vague to work with.

Comment author: whpearson 29 May 2009 01:01:09AM *  0 points [-]

If you have a problem with optimization power take it up with the person that coined it.

What ever it is that you expect to go up and up and up during in a FOOMing RSI, that is the measure I want to capture and explore. Can you tell me about your hopefully less vague measure?