Annoyance comments on A social norm against unjustified opinions? - Less Wrong

11 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 29 May 2009 11:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (158)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Annoyance 01 June 2009 04:53:07PM *  1 point [-]

Out of curiosity, can someone who does not have a grain of rationality in them ever become more rational?

They may stumble across rationality as life causes their core functions to randomly vary. As far as I can tell, that's how explicit and self-referential standards of thought first arose - they seem to have occurred in societies where there were many different ideas and claims being made about everything, and people needed a way to sift through the rich bed of assertions.

So complex and mutually-incompatible cultural fluxes seem to not only be necessary to produce the first correct standards, but encourage them to be developed as well. That argument applies more to societies than individuals, but I think a similar one holds there too.

Short answer: only by chance, I think.

Comment author: MrHen 01 June 2009 05:34:37PM 0 points [-]

Short answer: only by chance, I think.

Understood. I guess the followup question is about where the general human being starts. Do we start with any rationality in us? My guess is that it is somewhat random. Some do; some do not.