nazgulnarsil comments on Open Thread: June 2009 - Less Wrong

4 Post author: Cyan 01 June 2009 06:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (142)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: nazgulnarsil 01 June 2009 09:46:03PM 0 points [-]

I'm highly skeptical of the idea that rationalism isn't a strategy for getting laid. It's just a strategy that says the direct methods of using manipulation are worse than using rationality to get rich (or save the world, or something in between). This is because we recognize that most manipulators fall prey to their own shoddy reasoning and are ultimately handicapping themselves even if they have more success in the short term.
Of course such rationalizing about short term vs long term success can be thought of as a natural response from high IQ nerds who find little success with women in day-to-day life. I still think this is true even if it turns out to be correct that long term planning pays off (as is usually the case, unless you get hit by a truck :)

bring on the downvotes.

Comment author: MichaelBishop 02 June 2009 02:20:22AM *  2 points [-]

Rationalism, as discussed on LW, is not particularly helpful for getting laid.

Perhaps what you mean is that our interest in rationalism is motivated by mental circuits which are indirectly oriented towards us getting laid. This is true, but this could also be said of peoples interest in sports, dance, conversation, literature and the arts, etc. Is there any reason to believe it is more true of rationalism?

Comment author: pjeby 02 June 2009 04:59:15AM 3 points [-]

Rationalism, as discussed on LW, is not particularly helpful for getting laid.

Well, if you filter out the epistemic stuff and focus on various instrumental-rationality bits like:

  • Willingness to accept unpleasant or unpopular ideas

  • Willingness to try things you see others succeeding with, even if they seem to be based on ideas that are absurd or impossibly wrong

  • Willingness to suspend disbelief while you are doing something, separating evaluating from doing

  • Observing reality to see what works, rather than imagining you are more (or less) successful than you actually are, by devising as-objective-as-practical test/success criteria in advance

  • Accepting others' beliefs and worldviews at face value, without judging them "good" or "bad"

Then yeah, you will find some useful things here, though of course perhaps not nearly as useful things as studying some domain-specific materials on the topic. But the above ideas will serve you well in any domain that involves influencing human behavior, whether it's your own behavior or someone else's.