rhollerith comments on Mate selection for the men here - Less Wrong

13 Post author: rhollerith 03 June 2009 11:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (111)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: pjeby 04 June 2009 05:00:26AM 3 points [-]

Female rationalists may well be great matches for male rationalists. But they are rarer

Is that really true? It could easily be an availability bias on my part, but I find most non-airheaded women to be supremely rational on the instrumental level. Much more level-headed and focused on results, and far less likely to get obsessed about some stupid thing the way men do, with the possible exception of a man or a social drama, and in both cases, those things are usually short-lived by comparison to male irrational obsessions, or so ISTM.

(Of course, most of the women I meet these days besides my wife are either at internet marketing conferences, or else customers of mine. So, could easily be some sort of bias factor there!)

Comment author: rhollerith 04 June 2009 08:11:31PM 1 point [-]

Yes, but there is a sense of the word "rationalist" that makes HughRistik's quote (and my post) make sense. Something like "strongly motivated to learn science and the art of rationality" or "the kind of person you become if for the last 20 years you have been strongly motivated to . . ."

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 04 June 2009 09:01:51PM *  1 point [-]

"the kind of person you become if for the last 20 years you have been strongly motivated to . . ."

For the last 20 years???