Ladies and Gentlemen and Other Folks, I am the first ever Moldbuggian Christian Progressive in the world, and I'm here to bring the Good News and the Sword!
--
Some left-wing Christian sermons of recent times:
"The only church that illuminates is a burning church" - Slavoj Zizek
"Stop Teaching the Ethics of Jesus!" - Peter Rollins (Follow-up podcast: "Treating Ethics as a Failure that Succeeds")
"I pray the children of my enemies be dashed against the rocks" - Peter Rollins (that one isn't in fact ideological, just an intelligent observation)
"Philip K. Dick and the Umbrella of Light" - Angus Taylor
--
Some kickass hymns and gospels - by a recent band with the inspiration of William Blake, the vision of Oscar Wilde, and zero patience with "art for art's sake":
The Indelicates - Sympathy for the Devil
--
Owen Hatherley's badass art and architecture blog. British Socialism is counterfactually alive under the ruins! +plenty of links to make Mencius throw up.
--
Coming in the next installment: a look at Stieg Larsson's Millennium series - as a Social Democrat Nordic Saga, infused with a dream of redemption - and conclusive proof that Breivik didn't know shit!
(Feel free to share your thoughts on any of the texts above, I enjoyed them all!)
Thanks a lot for The Indelicates recommendation! I really liked I am Koresh and New art for the people.
In line with the results of the poll here, a thread for discussing politics. Incidentally, folks, I think downvoting the option you disagree with in a poll is generally considered poor form.
1.) Top-level comments should introduce arguments; responses should be responses to those arguments.
2.) Upvote and downvote based on whether or not you find an argument convincing in the context in which it was raised. This means if it's a good argument against the argument it is responding to, not whether or not there's a good/obvious counterargument to it; if you have a good counterargument, raise it. If it's a convincing argument, and the counterargument is also convincing, upvote both. If both arguments are unconvincing, downvote both.
3.) A single argument per comment would be ideal; as MixedNuts points out here, it's otherwise hard to distinguish between one good and one bad argument, which makes the upvoting/downvoting difficult to evaluate.
4.) In general try to avoid color politics; try to discuss political issues, rather than political parties, wherever possible.
If anybody thinks the rules should be dropped here, now that we're no longer conducting a test - I already dropped the upvoting/downvoting limits I tried, unsuccessfully, to put in - let me know. The first rule is the only one I think is strictly necessary.
Debiasing attempt: If you haven't yet read Politics is the Mindkiller, you should.