philh comments on This is why we can't have social science - All

36 Post author: Costanza 13 July 2014 09:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 14 July 2014 01:22:19PM 4 points [-]

My interpretation is that he's saying false positives are unlikely but false negatives are common. If that's the case, then getting a positive result should greatly affect your beliefs; but a negative replication shouldn't shift them much.

(I can't actually justify this interpretation by reading the text, but it does make the text seem fairly reasonable.)