but the guy did work on wall street for a number of years, and has written his financial newsletter for years as well.
That doesn't make him an authority on financial crises. It makes him a Wall St. M&A lawyer who went into journalism.
I feel like the quotes I've made recently have been taken less charitably than is usual here.
Perhaps try with quotes that are more than "a simplistic view that gets at some truth"?
I see no reason to be charitable to quotes, anyway. There is a very very large number of quotable sentences around and stringent curation is much better than loose, lest we drown in clever turns of phrase without much insight behind them.
I'm not really arguing for a different norm. I'm just noting that it seems the norms have changed.
Also, you still haven't really justified your opposition to the claim. Even if you aren't going to be charitable, you should at least explain why you're rejecting it, in a more substantial critique than "naive".
Another month, another rationality quotes thread. The rules are: