= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Lumifer comments on Open thread, Jul. 11 - Jul. 17, 2016 - All
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (131)
As far as I can see, the experiment has shown that what was considered to be the lower bound is actually not.
However I don't understand how the claim of "no lower bound at all" necessarily follows. For all we know there is just a different, lower (lower bound).
I found it odd as well but I think it's because it implies that the theoretical reason for that lower bound may be invalid.
There's likely going to turn out to be a different theoretical lower bound for some other reason but right now we don't have that theoretical reason.