You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Messy Science - Less Wrong Discussion

12 [deleted] 30 September 2010 06:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 02 October 2010 02:12:46PM 1 point [-]

I'd venture to suggest that this can be a problem in any cutting edge field. For example, look at computational complexity. Resolving questions like P ? = NP are tough. There are many different proposed methods of attack and lots of people saying that methods that other people are working on don't stand a chance or are extremely unlikely to succeed. So even in fields that are not young and are not interdisciplinary this sort of problem can exist. This difficulty may be a natural corollary of simply doing research on the cutting edge of a field. The only reason this might seem more prominent in young fields is that, if I may abuse a metaphor, in those fields there's a much larger surface area that is the cutting edge.