David_Allen comments on Which parts of philosophy are worth studying from a pragmatic perspective? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (29)
I am currently studying a broad range of philosophical topics. I'm not prepared to suggest what is pragmatic to study, but rather how to study it pragmatically.
When I study a topic, I always have a goal in mind to direct my approach to the topic. This keeps me from getting bogged down and gives me a basis for choosing which leads to follow.
This is probably important in any field, but it appears to be especially important in philosophy. Philosophy is layered on itself with argument and counter argument. The current state of a topic depends greatly on its history. This also has helped me separate ancient and debunked ideas from modern ideas.
I have found that getting an overview helps to establish the main ideas and history of a topic. Then I am free to drill down in the areas that interest me most.
Different sources will focus on different aspects of a topic. Also, some authors write to look smart, and some write to communicate clearly. I don't let myself get bogged down in opaque articles, I can usually find easier to read sources if I look.
I have found there to be a lot of bunk in both classical and modern philosophy. Don't simply accept the conclusions you read about, challenge them and research the counter arguments to your points.