You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

nhamann comments on Fields Medalists on School Mathematics - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: multifoliaterose 11 October 2010 10:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (19)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: nhamann 11 October 2010 09:25:04PM 0 points [-]

I hated much of what was taught as mathematics in my early schooling, and I often received poor grades. I now view many of these early lessons as anti-math: they actively tried to discourage independent thought. One was supposed to follow an established pattern with mechanical precision, put answers inside boxes, and "show your work,"

I guess this puts me out of the running for obtaining a Fields Medal, because I have excelled (and continue to excel) at this kind of work since a young age. :[

Comment author: multifoliaterose 11 October 2010 10:20:53PM *  1 point [-]

Oh no, there's substantial variability among great mathematicians on this point. If I make this article into a top level point I should add qualification to this effect. I don't have the exact quote at hand (will add later), but for counterpoint I'll say that in the same book Don Zagier describes how when he was eleven his teacher told him that if he wanted to, he could read advanced math books in class provided that he precommitted to getting perfect scores on all of his exams. He said

She told me that I could choose whether or not I wanted to accept these conditions, and of course I did. It was very good training because I learned to be quick and careful even in routine calculations, and that was very helpful later.