= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Unnamed comments on Ethics of Jury nullification and TDT? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (32)
Another question is what you should say during jury selection. What if they ask your opinion about drug laws, or if you will be able to faithfully & impartially apply those laws regardless of your opinion?
Well, first question is "should I consider nullification type stuff a good idea at all?"
Second, is if I consider the answer to be yes, should I be willing to lie about it? That seems even more shaky. I'm thinking ethical injunctions here and such. (ie, "don't go lying about relevant stuff in the context of a court/justice system (at least one that is vaguely reasonably fair) "
So yeah, that's a second question.