You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ShardPhoenix comments on Ben Goertzel: The Singularity Institute's Scary Idea (and Why I Don't Buy It) - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: Kevin 30 October 2010 03:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ShardPhoenix 30 October 2010 11:27:45AM *  2 points [-]

"I think the relation between breadth of intelligence and depth of empathy is a subtle issue which none of us fully understands (yet). It's possible that with sufficient real-world intelligence tends to come a sense of connectedness with the universe that militates against squashing other sentiences."

Oh ok, never mind about FAI, the woo-woo will save us all.

Comment author: Relsqui 30 October 2010 08:12:39PM *  4 points [-]

Way to quotemine. Here's the next line, for people who haven't yet read the article themselves:

"But I'm not terribly certain of this, any more than I'm terribly certain of its opposite."

Comment author: ShardPhoenix 30 October 2010 11:28:54PM 3 points [-]

Regardless of how not-so-certain he is about it, it seems pretty irrational to say, "well, maybe this bad scenario will happen, but my wishful thinking scenario is just as likely!".

Comment author: Relsqui 31 October 2010 01:27:37AM 3 points [-]

My interpretation was that he found both about as plausible, i.e. not very. And the fragment out of context made it seem like the part you quoted was what he actually believed to be the truth, which was certainly misrepresenting him regardless of exactly how implausible he found that scenario to be.