You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Douglas_Knight comments on Specification failure - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: cousin_it 04 November 2010 06:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 05 November 2010 01:02:23AM 4 points [-]

I am amazed by how strongly the labels on software warp people's language. I would only use "ban" for users, not posts. It does not surprise me so much when natively English-speaking moderators report their actions in terms of the buttons they just pressed, though those buttons are not visible to the hoi polloi, but it does surprise me when they are unable to comprehend the confusion produced. A similar story was a boing-boing author's indignant insistence that they had "unpublished" rather than "deleted" a post.

Comment author: Relsqui 05 November 2010 04:13:09AM 0 points [-]

A similar story was a boing-boing author's indignant insistence that they had "unpublished" rather than "deleted" a post.

In fairness, there's a pretty important difference between "make invisible" and "destroy." I don't know if that's the distinction in question, though.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 05 November 2010 04:22:17AM 2 points [-]

If this is about the Violet Blue debacle then the distinction was more or less a distinction without a difference.