You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nick_Roy comments on Hi - I'm new here - some questions - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: InquilineKea 14 November 2010 04:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nick_Roy 15 November 2010 02:17:36AM 0 points [-]

Hmmm. This does seem based on self-experimentation, unfortunately. To which research is Taleb referring to?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 November 2010 03:16:39AM 0 points [-]

I don't know what his research sources are.

I find his evolutionary arguments plausible, though I think there may have been some long distance running (not at marathon pace) for transportation and/or cursorial hunting in ancestral environments.

His approach seems like a reasonable experiment-- plausible, not especially dangerous. The idea that a regular schedule for food and exercise is better seems like an unexamined fairly modern assumption.

Comment author: Nick_Roy 15 November 2010 05:15:36AM 0 points [-]

This is certainly interesting, but I'll wait for more studies before I try any of this on myself, since parts of Taleb's approach are a bit dangerous, including improper sleep duration and prolonged periods of physical inactivity. Risk-benefit analyses of fasting and infrequent intense exercise are also inconclusive at present.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 15 November 2010 09:46:17AM *  0 points [-]

I'm not sure if he meant prolonged periods of no exercise at all, or (as I suspect) prolonged periods of nothing more intense than long leisurely walks.

Comment author: Nick_Roy 15 November 2010 06:35:07PM 0 points [-]

Hmmm. Good point. I'd still be careful with sleep duration, though.