You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

cousin_it comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 6 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Unnamed 27 November 2010 08:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (541)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: cousin_it 07 December 2010 01:00:55PM 5 points [-]

I finally realized what all this slithering reminds me of! If you want to experience the same emotions as Harry and the other kids when they weave Slytherin-style plots, lying to X about Y and to Y about X, brilliantly escaping from detection... just try juggling two or three concurrent girlfriends or boyfriends.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 07 December 2010 09:38:10PM 8 points [-]

Or if you want to do it in a way that isn't unethical, you can play Illuminati or Diplomacy or The "A Game of Thrones" Boardgame.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 December 2010 08:41:16PM 6 points [-]

just try juggling two or three concurrent girlfriends or boyfriends.

I'm actually rather curious as to what that would be like, specifically how difficult it would be to keep the intrigue from exploding. I'm actually thinking that these days Facebook would be most irritating hurdle.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 07 December 2010 03:00:31PM 2 points [-]

just try juggling two or three concurrent girlfriends or boyfriends

...who don't know about one another.

Comment author: David_Gerard 07 December 2010 03:22:40PM *  5 points [-]

just try juggling two or three concurrent girlfriends or boyfriends

...who don't know about one another.

From experience, open and informed polyamory isn't actually less work.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 07 December 2010 07:31:45PM 6 points [-]

Honest N-way relationships involve less plotting, lying, and escaping from detection than dishonest ones, which was my point. But, agreed, they still involve work.

Comment author: Sheaman3773 07 December 2010 06:24:13PM 2 points [-]

I think he added that line in reference to this part of the first poster that said:

lying to X about Y and to Y about X, brilliantly escaping from detection

Hopefully, that would not be included in an open relationship of any kind.