You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eugine_Nier comments on How Greedy Bastards Have Saved More Lives Than Mother Theresa Ever Did - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: waitingforgodel 03 December 2010 06:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 03 December 2010 07:46:14AM 6 points [-]

No, what Gates wanted was measurable results

The problem with demanding "measurable results", is that you'll get precisely what you measure, quite possibly by doing more damage in some other way that you didn't think to measure.

Comment author: Emile 03 December 2010 09:13:15AM 11 points [-]

Possibly, but all else being equal, the expected utility should still be higher if you measure something than if you measure nothing.

Comment author: waitingforgodel 03 December 2010 10:10:59AM 2 points [-]

Agree. It's true that optimizing too hard for one variable can lead to unexpected sadness, but it's also true that if you don't measure progress you don't get anywhere :p

Comment author: Kingreaper 03 December 2010 12:51:16PM 7 points [-]

But if you don't measure anything, all you'll get is things you didn't measure.

Which means you're not even guaranteed to be helping along the axis you're trying to help.

Comment author: DanielLC 09 November 2013 07:45:39PM 1 point [-]

This problem exists in businesses as well. Bill Gates has dealt with it before.