= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
timtyler comments on Less Wrong: Open Thread, December 2010 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (84)
Is that what they mean by "getting the inside track on the singularity"? ;-)
It gets to possibly say "No", once. Nothing else.
Are you under the impression that jumping on statements like this, after the original statement explicitly disclaimed them, is a positive contribution to the conversation?
Yu'El - please don't you jump on me! I was mostly trying to be funny. Check with my smiley!
This was a reference to Jaron Lanier's comment on this topic - in discussion with you.