You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Manfred comments on A Thought on Pascal's Mugging - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: komponisto 10 December 2010 06:08AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (159)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Manfred 11 December 2010 04:32:11AM 0 points [-]

This isn't really the limiting reagent in the reaction, though. I can communicate all sorts of awful things (sorry, had to share - it's totally my fault if you end up reading the entire thread) much more easily than I can do them.

Comment author: komponisto 11 December 2010 05:27:59PM 1 point [-]

I can communicate all sorts of awful things much more easily than I can do them.

Not for things with values in the range of 3^^^^3 -- in such a case the difference between ability-to-communicate and ability-to-carry-out is pretty much negligible. (The complexity of an action with 3^^^^3 units of disutility is right around 3^^^^3, under my proposal.)

Comment author: Manfred 11 December 2010 11:11:29PM *  0 points [-]

Ah shoot, I read this post, and then I read SewingMachine's post, and then I realized my reply to this post was wrong.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 December 2010 11:22:57PM 2 points [-]

The Kolmogorov complexity of one bad thing repeated N times grows like log(N)

I'll repeat my other comment. log(N) is an upper bound for the complexity of N, but complexity of N can be much smaller. Complexity of 3^^^3 is tiny compared to log(3^^^3).

Comment author: Manfred 11 December 2010 11:25:40PM 0 points [-]

Oh, you totally got ninja'd.