You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

topynate comments on Should LW have a public censorship policy? - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: Bongo 11 December 2010 10:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: topynate 12 December 2010 08:20:55PM 11 points [-]

"Do you want to know?" whispered the guide; a whisper nearly as loud as an ordinary voice, but not revealing the slightest hint of gender.

Brennan paused. The answer to the question seemed suspiciously, indeed extraordinarily obvious, even for ritual.

"Yes, provided that * * * ** * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * ** * * * * **," Brennan said finally.

"Who told you to say that?", hissed the guide.

Comment author: FormallyknownasRoko 12 December 2010 08:44:26PM *  6 points [-]

Brennan is a fucking retard. No, you don't want to know. You want to signal affiliation with desirable groups, to send hard-to-fake signals of desirable presonality traits such as loyalty, intelligence, power and the presence of informed allies. You want to say everything bad you possibly can about the outgroup and everything good about the ingroup. You want to preech altruism and then make a plausible but unlikely reasoning error which conveniently stops you from having to give away anything costly.

All the other humans do all of these things. This is the true way of our kind. You will be punished if you deviate from the way, or even if you try to overtly mention that this is the way.

Comment author: katydee 17 December 2010 03:46:30AM *  8 points [-]

This may be the way now, but it doesn't have to be the way always.