You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Perplexed comments on What topics would you like to see more of on LessWrong? - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Emile 13 December 2010 04:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (137)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 14 December 2010 12:08:18AM 7 points [-]

I want LW to have a good shot at advancing humanity's understanding. For that it's not enough to be rational, you also have to be at the frontier of an area.

I disagree on two counts. For one, I doubt that LW is the best place to develop original research (i.e. to publish ideas and rough drafts and get feedback). For that, you want a different kind of forum or 'subscription list' or wiki or RSS feed. Something with fewer people, most of whom are likely to read what you write. Something more focused. And, more important than a subscription list, you also need a peer-reviewed journal, so that your finished research actually gets academically published. SIAI should create a journal. JFAI or IJFAI.

Second, I disagree that the only way to advance humanity's understanding is by doing original research. We can also advance mankind's intellectual heritage indirectly, by doing original pedagogy - by publicizing ideas and problems in an interesting way for a broader audience, and thus attracting more sharp people to working with you at the cutting edge.

Comment author: cousin_it 14 December 2010 12:57:14AM *  2 points [-]

We have a mailing list on decision theory. Many new results we post here come originally from there. LW served as catalyst for bringing us together, creating interest in decision theory. Hopefully LW can serve as catalyst for other topics too.

Comment author: wedrifid 14 December 2010 11:13:37AM 4 points [-]

We have a mailing list on decision theory. Many new results we post here come originally from there. LW served as catalyst for bringing us together, creating interest in decision theory.

Who is 'we' and where is said list?

To the extent that the 'we' is exclusive it is not relevant to LW or this post and to the extent that it is not I'd like to know where it is. :)

Comment author: cousin_it 14 December 2010 11:26:35AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: wedrifid 14 December 2010 11:39:39AM 0 points [-]

Thanks. If someone there accepts me I'll have a whole lot more stuff to add to my incremental reading collection. :)

Comment author: Vaniver 14 December 2010 06:24:41PM 1 point [-]

We can also advance mankind's intellectual heritage indirectly, by doing original pedagogy

Strong agreement. When you say "advance mankind" instead of "advance an academic discipline" you need either technology or education, and rationality isn't the sort of thing that can be turned into technology easily.