You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on Bullying the Integers - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: sixes_and_sevens 15 December 2010 05:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Emile 16 December 2010 11:20:11AM 2 points [-]

I wouldn't be excessively surprised if someone found a regularity in a common pseudorandom generator algorithm that could be exploited to narrow down the search for the prime numbers used for RSA keys.

This would fall under "breaking some implementations of RSA" and not "breaking RSA", but is close enough for practical purposes that your colleague might be right (or at least, not be in a seperate cast-iron category of "wrong", especially if you also consider quantum computing arguments).

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 16 December 2010 01:20:39PM 1 point [-]

My quibble wasn't whether he was right or wrong about the breakability of RSA. It was that the answer to the question sits on other notoriously open questions which can in principle be fundamentally solved one way or the other, and which you can't just pull an answer out of your arse for.