You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on Varying amounts of subjective experience - Less Wrong Discussion

-7 Post author: DanielLC 16 December 2010 03:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 17 December 2010 04:20:22AM 0 points [-]

It has to have an x and y velocity. It's just that one of them can be zero. I calculated what they were, and neither was zero.

What do you mean by the start and end of the experiment? The moment the photon leaves one mirror, and the moment it gets to the other?

I'll let t = t1 - t0, x = x1 - x0, and y = y1 - y0, where (x0, y0, t0) marks the start of the experiment and (x1, y1, t1) marks then end. You can't give just the time due to the relativity of simultaneity.

The spacetime interval is zero (it always is with light). So that's sqrt(x^2 + y^2 - t^2) = 0. Setting y to one and solving for x, you get x = sqrt(t^2 - 1). Solving for t = 2, you get x = sqrt(3). This means that, from the point of reference where the light is moving up one meter and horizontally sqrt(3), it takes two meters per c, as opposed to one in the planet's frame. The photon is moving horizontally at the same rate as the planet. Thus, if the planet moves sqrt(3) meters horizontally between the light moving from one mirror to the other, everything takes twice as long as if it doesn't move at all.

Comment author: Davorak 17 December 2010 05:05:29AM *  -1 points [-]

You are going to have to set up your problem more rigorously and clear if we are to continue this conversation.

edit: typo

Comment author: DanielLC 17 December 2010 08:07:10PM -1 points [-]

The light is staying between the mirrors, which means it's moving diagonally, which means it will take longer.

Where in that are you getting lost?