Its interesting that LW was being cited as a valid authority to make deeper points like "probability is in the mind, not reality". I've never seen that tendency anywhere but here.

Anyone want to give odds on whether/when content from LW will start showing up as more authoritative than wikipedia when searching for standard terms like "cognitive bias"?

Or maybe a deeper question to motivate content generation and organization on our own part: what terms should eventually link to LW content? Any general terms like "Bayesian" or "Map vs Territory" or "Singularity"?

Type in "politics is the" and google suggests the following completions:

• "...art of art the possible"

• "...art of compromise"

• "...art of art of looking for trouble"

Add an M with "politics is the m" and google changes to:

• "...master science"

• "...mind-killer"

• "...master science aristotle"

• "...management"