You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

paulfchristiano comments on Asking Precise Questions - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: paulfchristiano 03 January 2011 08:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: paulfchristiano 04 January 2011 12:42:27AM 0 points [-]

Modeling physical systems is already hard. I don't think we could yet write down the dynamics of the physical systems well enough (or rather, we don't understand what the most important characteristics are) to come up with a precise formulation of the major problems in synthetic biology or nanotechnology. I certainly concede that an optimizer would be helpful in solving many subproblems, and would considerably increase the speed of new developments in pretty much every field. I don't think it solves many problems on its own though.

But even if you could solve narrow existing technological problems or develop new technologies at a steady pace, it seems like you should be able to do more. Suppose the box can do in a minute what takes existing humans a million years. Then our only upper bound on our capabilities using the box is whatever we expect of a million years of progress at the current pace. I don't know about you, but I expect pretty much everything.