= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
XiXiDu comments on A Bayesian Argument for the Resurrection of Jesus - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
The link to the bibliography on Bayesian reasoning is dead for me :-(
ETA: Google cache.
ETA #2: While looking for that link I came across this paper by the above mentioned Richard Carrier: “Bayes’ Theorem for Beginners: Formal Logic and Its Relevance to Historical Method — Adjunct Materials and Tutorial”
Some theists are mocking the Carrier article's mistakes over here.
Hmm, having read that comments thread I now need to worry that Carrier's prior tutorial on Bayes's theorem might have egregious errors. There are a lot of basic probability errors outlined in that thread.