= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
lukeprog comments on A Bayesian Argument for the Resurrection of Jesus - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
Some theists are mocking the Carrier article's mistakes over here.
Hmm, having read that comments thread I now need to worry that Carrier's prior tutorial on Bayes's theorem might have egregious errors. There are a lot of basic probability errors outlined in that thread.