You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jack comments on A cautionary note about "Bayesianism" - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: PhilGoetz 10 January 2011 01:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (11)
Tags: lesswrong meta bayes

Comments (11)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jack 12 January 2011 02:03:24AM *  1 point [-]

I say the last except I pronounce the sh a bit like a French J or the 'g' in "mirage". Just like "Cartesian". I've never heard the first. The second I've heard but I don't like as much.

Comment author: ewang 12 January 2011 02:33:54AM 0 points [-]

That's what I was thinking, but I couldn't find a way to properly express the sound.

Comment author: Sniffnoy 12 January 2011 02:41:52AM *  1 point [-]

The most common notation for this seems to be "zh" (since it's a voiced "sh").

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit