= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
NancyLebovitz comments on Meta: A 5 karma requirement to post in discussion - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (51)
I don't know if this is just me, but I feel as though blocking the spam isn't just a matter of preventing inconvenience.
I keep thinking "these folks think they have a chance of getting self-optimizing FAI right the first time, and they can't even keep spam off their site".
"Help us develop an AI advanced enough and friendly enough to solve the spam problem, solve the good comments problem and make the discussion on YouTube and Yahoo Answers insightful and properly spelt."
Hi, I'm new.
Yes, that's Stross's Spamularity proposal:
http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/12/its-made-out-of-meat.html