You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

David_Gerard comments on Meta: A 5 karma requirement to post in discussion - Less Wrong Discussion

46 Post author: Jack 20 January 2011 06:22AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: David_Gerard 21 January 2011 10:39:00PM *  0 points [-]

Sounds like a not awful idea on the surface. But - what's the current graph of karma-at-time-of-posting look like for discussion posts? I know we've had a few lengthy extended intro posts from newbies which have in fact been quite excellent. Better temporarily suffer some spam than lose those.

Comment author: Desrtopa 24 January 2011 02:44:46AM *  2 points [-]

Whenever I see a post from someone whose username looks unfamiliar, I check their user profile. I haven't noticed anyone making a discussion post starting at single digit karma. In any case though, I doubt we would actually lose the contributions; if the users actually intend to hang around the site, they'll probably simply post them after receiving 5 karma; it's not as if it takes long to get that much if you have anything worthwhile to contribute.

Edit: actually, on reexamination, jhwendy did have single digit karma when he made his first (very worthwhile) discussion post, but his introduction comment alone was enough to account for 6 karma, so he should still have been able to make the post if the requirement were instituted.