You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on Who are these spammers? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Mitchell_Porter 20 January 2011 09:18AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (28)
Tags: spammers

Comments (28)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 21 January 2011 01:03:12AM *  0 points [-]

to click

We are not supposed to be the ones clicking them. (And the few posts I glanced at did contain links, for what it is worth.)

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 21 January 2011 09:35:43PM 2 points [-]

For topynate's suggested search, I find 3 of the first 20 hits contain links. This is not what it would look like if they were checking their work.

nofollow is a solution to the problem of spamming google. Nofollow as a function of karma would be pretty nice, but might not fit the codebase well.

Comment author: wedrifid 22 January 2011 03:15:30AM 4 points [-]

nofollow is a solution to the problem of spamming google. Nofollow as a function of karma would be pretty nice, but might not fit the codebase well.

I kind of like the idea of retargetting all 'pandora' links (and adding links to all pandora posts lacking them) such that they all link to the official pandora jewellry site. Mostly just for fun.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit