Can you explain and/or link this analysis of transparent Newcomb? It looks very wrong to me.
Can you explain and/or link this analysis of transparent Newcomb? It looks very wrong to me.
It's only wrong if you are the kind of person who doesn't like getting $1,000,000.
If only all our knowledge of our trading partners and environment was as reliable as 'fundamentally included in the very nature of the problem specification'. You have to think a lot harder when you are only kind of confident and know the limits of your own mind reading capabilities.
Here's an edited version of a puzzle from the book "Chuck Klosterman four" by Chuck Klosterman.
When should you punish someone for a crime they will commit in the future? Discuss.