You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nisan comments on What is Eliezer Yudkowsky's meta-ethical theory? - Less Wrong Discussion

33 Post author: lukeprog 29 January 2011 07:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (368)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nisan 09 March 2011 03:25:19AM 1 point [-]

I thought being persuaded of a metaethical theory entails that whenever the theory tells you you should do X, you would feel compelled to do X.

Comment author: lukeprog 09 March 2011 03:56:42AM 2 points [-]

Only if motivational internalism is true. But motivational internalism is false.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 March 2011 04:00:07AM 0 points [-]

What's that?

Comment author: lukeprog 09 March 2011 04:41:07AM 0 points [-]
Comment author: [deleted] 09 March 2011 04:54:07AM 1 point [-]

I could get into how much I hate this kind of rejoinder if you bait me some more. I wasn't asking you for the number of acres in a square mile. Let me just rephrase:

I hadn't heard of motivational internalism before, could you expand your comment?

Comment author: [deleted] 09 March 2011 03:48:38AM 1 point [-]

This is a cool formulation. It's interesting that there are other things that can happen to you not similar to "being persuaded of a metaethical theory" that entail that whenever you are told to do X you're compelled to do X. (Voodoo or whatever.)