Normal_Anomaly comments on Avoid interruptions by time-shifting them - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (11)
Do you like that it's this way, or would you rather that you got around to reading the stuff?
I can't speak for jferguson, but I use Read It Later, and have had the same experience---and prefer it. Being able to decide whether or not I want to read something after I've put it off once is much less stressful, and I read less of the things that I don't really care about.
Agreed; it contextualizes the saved bits of information, a lot of times the outcome is not reading them - which is a WIN!
There was a fair amount of stuff in there that I "knew" I wanted to read (some LW sequences stuff among them). I've found a bit more success by putting things I actually want to read in my top-level bookmarks, right at the front, because then it causes clutter which I want to reduce (by reading and removing them). The difference may just be in that I'm less likely to bookmark something with this system in the first place, but it feels like it works.