= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Wei_Dai comments on Another Argument Against Eliezer's Meta-Ethics - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (35)
Agreed, but when IE is making decisions (using a process that is distinct from thinking about the decisions of FAIs and ideal selves), do the words "morality" or "should" ever enter into his mind and end up making a difference in his decisions? If so, what does he mean by them?
"Morality" describes (the result of) the process he uses. The thing as a whole is about morality, it is not an aspect in his decision process. Morality is the sum of the thousand shards of desire.